ANALISIS KINERJA REDISTRIBUSI ROUTING PROTOKOL DINAMIK (Studi Kasus : RIP, EIGRP, IS-IS)

Chairul Mukmin, Edi Surya Negara

Abstract


Each routing protocol has different algorithms and metrics in determining the best path on a network. Differences 1) Applications that only run on routing protocols 2) hardware from various vendors 3) Networks with different routing areas or domains. Some aspects that become a reference for some routing protocols that are issued from data sent and lost in the process of sending data (packet loss), speed in sending data (delay), as well as the ability of some routing protocols in choosing the closest distance when sending data transmission packets. Routing protocol characteristics. This study studies analyzing routing redistribution in dynamic routing protocols, in order to find out which routing protocols perform better in networks that are different from autonomous systems (AS) with measurement parameters of Throughput, Delay and Packet Loss.

Keywords :  EIGRP, IS-IS, Redistribution Routing, RIP, Routing Protocol

Setiap protokol routing memiliki algoritma dan metrik yang berbeda-beda dalam menentukan jalur terbaik pada sebuah jaringan. Perbedaan karakteristik tersebut menimbulkan beberapa masalah 1)aplikasi yang hanya  berjalan pada protokol routing tertentu 2)hardware dari berbagai vendor 3)Jaringan dengan area atau domain routing berbeda. Beberapa aspek yang menjadi acuan suatu protokol routing diantaranya dari segi data yang terkirim dan hilang dalam proses pengiriman data (packet loss), kecepatan dalam pengiriman data (delay), juga kemampuan suatu protokol routing dalam memilih jarak terdekat bahkan jalur terbaik dalam pengiriman paket data. Perbedaan karakteristik protokol routing tersebut tersebut dapat diselesaikan dengan cara menggunakan redistribusi routing. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis perbandingan redistribusi routing pada protokol routing dinamik, guna mencari tahu protokol routing mana yang lebih baik kinerjanya dalam jaringan yang berbeda autonomous system (AS) dengan parameter pengukuran Throughput, Delay dan Packet Loss.

Kata Kunci : EIGRP, IS-IS, Redistribusi Routing, RIP, Protokol Routing


Full Text:

PDF

References


I. Sofana, “CISCO CCNA & Jaringan Komputer,” in CISCO CCNA & Jaringan Komputer, 2012.

J. Handoyo, “KAJIAN PENGGUNAAN MIKROTIK ROUTER OSTM SEBAGAI ROUTER PADA JARINGAN KOMPUTER,” J. Transform., 2011.

L. S. Moonlight and S. Suhardi, “PENGARUH MODEL JARINGAN TERHADAP OPTIMASI ROUTING OPEN SHORTEST PATH FIRST (OSPF),” Teknologi, 2012.

G. R. J. Allan, Routing Protocols and Concepts, 13th ed. USA: Cisco Press, 2011.

M. C. A. D. N. S. Edi, “Application, Internasional Conference on Information Technology and Engineering,” in 1, 5th ed., Palembang: PPP-UBD Press, 2016, p. 180.

A. P. N. Permana and R. Firmansyah, “DISTRIBUSI JARINGAN MENGGUNAKAN ROUTING OSPF DENGAN METODE REDISTRIBUTION,” Simetris J. Tek. Mesin, Elektro dan Ilmu Komput., 2018.

A. Y. Nur and M. E. Tozal, “Identifying critical autonomous systems in the Internet,” J. Supercomput., 2018.

G. K. Dey, M. M. Ahmed, and K. T. Ahmmed, “Performance analysis and redistribution among RIPv2, EIGRP & OSPF Routing Protocol,” in 1st International Conference on Computer and Information Engineering, ICCIE 2015, 2016.

S. U. Masruroh, F. Robby, and N. Hakiem, “Performance evaluation of routing protocols RIPng, OSPFv3, and EIGRP in an IPv6 network,” in 2016 International Conference on Informatics and Computing, ICIC 2016, 2017.

S. U. Masruroh, A. Fiade, M. F. Iman, and Amelia, “Performance evaluation of routing protocol RIPv2, OSPF, EIGRP with BGP,” in Proceedings - 2017 International Conference on Innovative and Creative Information Technology: Computational Intelligence and IoT, ICITech 2017, 2018.

Suzanzefi, F. Utami, and Lindawati, “Optimalisasi Load Balancing Dua Isp Untuk Manajemen Bandwidth Berbasis Mikrotik,” Pros. Semin. Nas. Multi Disiplin Ilmu Call Pap. SNATI F, 2017.

F. Y. D. Saputro, “ICMP (Internet Control Message Protocol),” 2015. [Online]. Available: https://ilmukomputer.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/yama-icmp.pdf. [Accessed: 06-Sep-2019].

H. Fahmi, “Analisis QoS (Quality of Service) Pengukuran Delay, Jitter, Packet Lost Dan Throughput Untuk Mendapatkan Kualitas Kerja Radio Streaming Yang Baik,” Teknol. Inf. dan Komun., 2018.

Agusriandi, “ANALISIS DELAY JITTER, THROUGHPUT, DAN PAKET LOST MENGGUNAKAN IPERF3,” 2016. [Online]. Available: https://ilmukomputer.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Agusriandi-Analisis.pdf. [Accessed: 09-Sep-2019].




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/klik.v6i3.262

Copyright (c) 2019 KLIK - KUMPULAN JURNAL ILMU KOMPUTER

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Indexed by:

  
 

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.joomla
counter View My Stats